Cross-border payments or international payments are essential for global trade, investment and remittances. SWIFT has been one of the dominant players in the global payment landscape for many years. The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication introduced innovation into the international payments sector to fight against challenges with traditional methods for cross-border payments.
The Ripple vs. Swift debate has gained momentum in recent times with blockchain technology bringing in new alternatives like Ripple for improving cross-border payments. You must know that Ripple has emerged as a formidable contender of Swift for global payment dominance. Let us compare Ripple with Swift to find out whether it is a worthy contender or just another blockchain protocol.
Build your identity as a certified blockchain expert with 101 Blockchains’ Blockchain Certifications designed to provide enhanced career prospects.
Introduction to Swift as a Leader in Global Payments
Before you compare Ripple with Swift, it is important to have a basic idea of what they are. Swift is a communication system tailored to help banks with cross-border transactions. Prior to the introduction of Swift, cross-border payments had to depend on manual processes and telex machines that slowed down transactions and increased the cost. Swift offered a reliable network that can enable secure communication between different banks all over the world.
People are likely to raise doubts over questions like ‘Will Ripple XRP replace SWIFT?’ because Swift has developed a huge network over the years. The network started with around 239 banks and has expanded as one of the biggest financial networks. It operates in over 200 countries and territories with an impressive scale that connects more than 11,000 financial institutions worldwide.
The notable financial institutions in the Swift network include clearing houses, asset management firms, securities brokers, corporate clients and banks. Swift also has leading global institutions as its members thereby implying that it manages a huge share of international financial transactions. As a popular standard for cross-border financial communications, Swift is a leader in global payments.
Unraveling the Special Highlights in Working of Swift
One of the common assumptions about the working mechanism of Swift is that it helps in transferring money between banks. It is important to know that Swift is a huge messaging network for financial institutions all over the world. The most important aspect in a Swift vs. Ripple comparison is the fact that Swift only transfers secure messages between banks and financial institutions. Let us assume that a customer submits a request for an international money transfer to their bank. The customer’s bank will initiate a SWIFT message featuring codes that only banks will understand and ensure faster transaction settlement. The message includes details about the sender, amount of money being sent, reason and currency.
During the journey to the recipient bank, the SWIFT message will move through different intermediary banks when the sending and receiving banks don’t have direct relationship. The intermediary banks process the message and deduct their handling fees before moving the remaining balance to the next bank. The process will continue until the message or the funds reach the recipient bank.
You can notice that SWIFT depends a lot on the network of correspondent banks spread throughout the world. The network obviously provides broader global coverage albeit with problems such as additional costs and delays. The complete process for cross-border fund transfer with Swift may take one to five business days. It is important to consider the processing efficiency of intermediary banks and the number of intermediary banks involved to determine the speed of transaction settlement with Swift.
Start learning Blockchain with World’s first Blockchain Career Paths with quality resources tailored by industry experts Now!
Role of Ripple as a Challenger against Swift in Global Payments
Ripple might have been another blockchain protocol along the lines of Ethereum with generic features. On the contrary, the creators Ripple XRP had tailored it to serve efficient cross-border money transfers. The relationship between Ripple and Swift is visible in their primary goals that revolve around streamlining international payments. Ripple aims to elevate the efficiency of global payments by ensuring that they are cheaper, faster and more efficient. The XRP Ledger resolves the notable concerns of cost and speed in cross-border transactions that are noted in traditional systems like Swift.
Ripple Labs has been successful in its efforts to revolutionize global payments. It has collaborated with some of the top banks and financial institutions to bridge the gap between blockchain and traditional finance. Some of the notable institutions that have collaborated with Ripple include American Express and Santander.
Ripple has everything required to challenge Swift as it not only focuses on international payments but also on other subdomains in finance. It can help in ensuring faster payments in trade finance that will help exporters and importers with faster transaction settlement at lower costs. The scope for CBDC development with Ripple blockchain makes it a popular choice for transforming digital payments.
Excited to learn the basic and advanced concepts of ethereum technology? Enroll now in the Ethereum Technology Course
Exploring the Magic behind the Performance of Ripple
The first thing that comes to mind when you hear about Ripple is blockchain technology. As a matter of fact, the biggest difference between Swift and Ripple is blockchain technology. Ripple blockchain enable direct cross-border payments rather than relying on involvement of multiple intermediary banks. The two most important components in the working of Ripple are the XRP Ledger and XRP token. The XRP Ledger is the decentralized blockchain network of Ripple while XRP token is the native cryptocurrency of XRP Ledger. XRP token stands out as a promising instrument for cross-border payments as it can serve as bridge between fiat currencies.
Ripple uses a network of validators for confirming transactions alongside ensuring integrity and security of the system. Ripple does not depend on mining thereby ensuring faster transaction settlement and more sustainability. Cross-border payments are more efficient on Ripple blockchain as the algorithm finds the most effective path for payment transfer. The path could involve currency exchanges through liquidity providers or direct transfer between member institutions in the Ripple network.
Liquidity providers for Ripple include specialized crypto trading firms and banks that ensure seamless conversion of fiat currencies when required. One of the notable features of the Ripple with respect to global payments is the flexibility to use XRP token as a bridge currency. The unique feature supports the faster and cost-effective conversion of currencies, which reduces the complexity of international payments.
Excited to learn the basics of cryptocurrency and the ways in which blockchain technology empowers cryptocurrencies, Enroll now in the Cryptocurrency Fundamentals Course
Comparative Analysis of Differences between Swift and Ripple
The introduction to Swift and the XRP Ledger provide a clear impression of their distinctive capabilities that can improve international payments. You must also review the two competitors for dominance over global payments by evaluating them in terms of different parameters. The following pointers can help you draw the line between Ripple blockchain and Swift messaging protocol for global payments.
-
Speed of Transaction Settlement
The first thing in any Ripple vs. Swift comparison is the speed and efficiency of international transfers. Swift is a messaging protocol and involves multiple intermediary banks in the process. The complex process followed by Swift for international payments is slower and is also affected by many other factors. The international transactions facilitated through Swift may take one to five business days for settlement. Some of the other factors that affect the speed of Swift transactions include exchange rate policies of banks, value of payment and impact of regulations.
On the other side of the battle, Ripple blockchain uses the XRP Ledger, RippleNet network and XRP token to facilitate faster cross-border transactions. Ripple has claimed that it can provide transaction settlement for international payments within seconds. At the same time, other factors such as compliance checks and network congestion also have a significant impact on transaction settlement with Ripple.
The next big point of comparison between Ripple and Swift is the cost and transparency of transactions. Swift imposes the burden of costs due to the involvement of multiple intermediary banks and charges for currency conversion. You may have to pay higher charges for intermediary bank fees and slower settlement times that keep your money locked up. It is also important to note that Swift does not provide the assurance of transparency into transaction fees and status of the transactions.
Ripple outperforms Swift by a huge margin in terms of cost-efficiency as it does not require a lot of intermediaries. The cost of one transaction on Ripple blockchain is around $0.50 which is considerably lower than that you have to spend with Swift transfers. On top of it, Ripple upholds the value of decentralization and offers real-time tracking of the transaction status. You can also find a clear fee structure with Ripple that provides the advantage of transparency.
Final Thoughts
Ripple seems like the most promising contender to take over global payments in a few years. You can trust Ripple for international payments as it outperforms Swift on all the major aspects such as transaction speed, cost and transparency. Ripple may fall behind in terms of regulations and widespread adoption as Swift has an upper hand in these two areas. However, financial institutions seeking solutions for large-scale international payments will find Ripple as a better alternative than Swift. Learn more about Ripple blockchain to understand how it can challenge Swift for dominance over the global payments industry now.
*Disclaimer: The article should not be taken as, and is not intended to provide any investment advice. Claims made in this article do not constitute investment advice and should not be taken as such. 101 Blockchains shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this article. Do your own research!
